Sex-related differences on the risks of in-hospital and late outcomes after acute aortic dissection: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the sex-related differences on the risks of perioperative and late outcomes for adult acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients following surgical management. METHODS AND RESULTS: By using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, totally 1,410 female and 3,432 male patients were identified to first-ever receive type A AAD open surgery or type B AAD stenting treatment from 2004 to 2013. We assessed the sex-related difference on outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, aortic death, redo aortic surgery, ischemic stroke, and depression during the follow-up period. The analysis was done separately for type A and type B surgeries. RESULTS: On average, female patients diagnosed with AAD were older than males. There was no significant sex difference of in-hospital mortality or all-cause mortality for both type A open and type B stent surgeries. The risk of redo aortic surgery was significantly greater in males than females (7.8% vs. 4%; unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.69) for type A open surgery, but not for type B stent surgery. Noticeably, the risk of newly-diagnosed depression was significantly greater in females than males (8% vs. 5.1%; unadjusted SHR 1.6, 95% CI 1.24-2.06) for type A open surgery, but not for type B stent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: No significant sex-related difference was found for the in-hospital mortality or accumulative all-cause mortality. However, there were more redo aortic surgeries for males and more postoperative depression for females in type A AAD population.

Admission Hyperglycemia in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Predicts for a Prolonged Duration of Mechanical Ventilation.

Previous studies have demonstrated that admission hyperglycemia is a predictor of mortality and poor prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases, such as acute myocardial infarction. However, the prognostic value of admission hyperglycemia in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) has never been explored. To clarify the association between hyperglycemia and in-hospital outcomes, we retrospectively analyzed 734 patients with AAAD. The interest endpoints were in-hospital mortality rate, the duration of intensive care unit and hospital stays, the occurrence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV), and other complications. All patients were divided into the normal blood glucose group (≤ 140 mg/dL) and hyperglycemia group (> 140 mg/dL), to compare the in-hospital outcomes rate in the two groups. There were 531 (72.3%) patients with normal blood glucose levels and 203 (27.7%) patients with hyperglycemia. The in-hospital mortality rate was 21.1%, and no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups (20.3% versus 23.2%, P = 0.403). PMV is the most frequent postoperative complication, the incidence of which was significantly higher in the hyperglycemia group than in the normal blood glucose group (59.6% versus 50.8%, P = 0.040). The logistic regression analysis revealed that hyperglycemia (odds ratio (OR): 1.492; 95% CI: 1.014 to 2.197; P = 0.042) was an independent risk factor for PMV after adjusting for confounding factors. Age (OR: 1.021; 95% CI: 1.006-1.037; P = 0.007) and body mass index (OR: 1.101; 95% CI: 1.051-1.153; P < 0.001) were also associated with PMV. In conclusion, our study showed for the first time that a strong correlation between admission hyperglycemia and increased postoperative PMV in patients with AAAD, but not with in-hospital mortality rate.

CT findings of type A acute aortic dissection that did and did not result in prehospital death.

ABSTRACT: The differences between the pathologies of cases of type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) that did and did not result in prehospital death (PHD) have not been fully elucidated.This study aimed to compare the CT findings and clarify the differences between the pathologies of such cases.Ninety four consecutive type A AAD patients between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. There were 47 males and 47 females (mean age: 69.0 ±â€Š14.4 years). The patients were divided into those that did (n = 25, 27%) and did not (n = 69, 73%) suffer PHD. We retrospectively evaluated the CT or postmortem CT findings of each case and analyzed the relationships between clinical factors (CT findings and clinical characteristics) and PHD using logistic regression analysis.Bloody pericardial effusion (96% vs 35%, P < .0001), bloody pleural effusion (40% vs 1%, P < .0001), and mediastinal hematomas (88% vs 14%, P < .0001) were significantly more common in the PHD group than in the no PHD group.In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, bloody pericardial effusion and lung consolidation were found to be significant risk factors for PHD (odds ratio: 21.29 [95% confidence intervals {CI}: 1.19-248.29] and 13.72 [95% CI: 1.79-105.06], respectively; P = .014 and P  = .012, respectively). AD affecting the abdominal aorta was identified as a significant negative risk factor for PHD (odds ratio: 0.02 [95% CI: 0.01-0.65]; P = .0042).Most PHD due to type A AAD are associated with hemorrhaging. Bleeding into the pericardium and type A AAD confined to the thoracic aorta are significant risk factors for PHD. Secondary respiratory failure might contribute to PHD in such cases.

Late Type 1A Endoleaks: Associated Factors, Prognosis and Management Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Unlike periprocedural Type 1A endoleaks, late appearing proximal endoleaks have been poorly described. METHODS: We studied all elective EVAR from 2010 -2018 in a single institution. Late endoleaks were defined as those appearing after 1 year. We used Cox regression to study factors associated with late Type 1A endoleaks and survival. RESULTS: Of 477 EVAR during the study period, 411 (86%) had follow-up imaging, revealing 24 Type 1A endoleaks; 4 early and 20 late. Freedom from Type 1A endoleaks was 99%, 92-81% at 1, 5 and 8 years with a median time to occurrence of 2.5 years (.01-8.2 years). On completion angiogram, only 10% of patients with a late Type 1A had a proximal endoleak, and 60% had no endoleak. Only 21% of late Type 1As were diagnosed on routine 1-year CT angiogram, but 79% had stable or expanding sacs. Two thirds (65%) of the patients eventually diagnosed with late Type 1A endoleaks had previously been treated for other endoleaks, mostly Type 2 (10/13). Age (HR 1.07/year [1.02-1.12], P = 0.01), neck diameter >28mm (HR 3.5 [1.2-10.3], P = 0.02), neck length <20mm (HR 3.0 [1.1-8.6], P = 0.04), and neck angle>60 degrees (HR 3.4 [1.5-7.9], P = 0.004) were associated with higher rates of Type 1A endoleak, but not female sex, endograft, or the use of suprarenal fixation. 2 patients had proximal degeneration and 5 experienced graft migration. There were 2 ruptures (10%), and 13 patients underwent repair with 5 open conversions. Median survival after late Type 1A repair was 6.6 years (0-8.4 years). CONCLUSION: Late appearing Type 1A endoleaks have a high rate of rupture and present significant diagnostic and management challenges. Careful surveillance is needed in patients with hostile neck anatomy and those who undergo intervention for other endoleaks. Adverse neck anatomy may be better suited for open repair or fenestrated/branched devices rather than conventional EVAR.

Midterm outcomes and durability of sinus segment preservation compared with root replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The durability of root repair for acute type A aortic dissection is not well studied in the context of aortic insufficiency and stability of the sinuses of Valsalva. We compared clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing root repair and replacement for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Of 716 patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, 585 (81.7%) underwent root repair and 131 (18.3%) underwent root replacement. Survival, cumulative incidence of reoperation, aortic insufficiency, and sinuses of Valsalva dilation were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 84.1% versus 77.3%, 70.8% versus 69.2%, 57.6% versus 58.0% in the root repair and replacement groups, respectively (P = .69). Cumulative incidence of reoperation at 1, 5, and 10 years was 0.0% versus 0.8%, 1.4% versus 3.8%, and 3.4% versus 8.6% in the root repair and root replacement groups, respectively (P = .011). Multivariable Cox regression identified sinuses of Valsalva diameter 45 mm or more as a risk factor for proximal aortic reoperation (hazard ratio, 9.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-65.24). In a repeated-measures, linear, mixed-effects model, root replacement was associated with smaller follow-up of sinuses of Valsalva dimensions (ß = -0.66, P < .001). In an ordinal longitudinal mixed model, root replacement was associated with lower severity of postoperative aortic insufficiency (ß = -3.10, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Survival is similar, but the incidence of aortic insufficiency and root dilation may be greater after root repair compared with root replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.

New 3-zone hybrid graft: First-in-man experience in acute type I dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Acute type I aortic dissection (AAD) represents a surgical emergency with time-dependent evolving complications. Frozen elephant trunk (FET) enables false lumen exclusion downstream but is still debated in AAD due to its greater dimension of surgery. To combine the benefits of fast proximal repair with the FET benefits, a 3-zone hybrid graft was developed consisting of an ascending polyester portion, an arch noncovered stent, and a descending stent graft. Mid-term results of this new technique are presented. METHODS: A total of 6 patients (age mean 69 years) with type I AAD in critical status (Penn classification B n = 5, BC n = 1) were operated between July 2016 and April 2018 using the 3-zone hybrid graft. The device was implanted on the basis of strict compassionate use. Operations were performed under distal hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP). RESULTS: Operative mortality was 17% (n = 1). Mean crossclamp and SACP time were 92 and 34 minutes, respectively, but came down in the last 2 cases to 75/65 crossclamp and 23/24 SACP minutes each. During follow up, mean 19 ± 12 months, one endovascular extension downstream was performed. Imaging control demonstrated no anastomotic-related proximal entry and no true lumen collapse downstream. CONCLUSIONS: The goal to achieve fast and reliable repair of complicated type I AAD down to midthoracic level seems to be achievable. Noncovered stenting of the head vessel's origin does not cause stenosis or obstruction. A multicenter studying of this concept is next.

Outcome Analysis and Risk Factors for Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia After Elective Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) after non-cardiac surgery remains a serious postoperative complication. This study analyzed the risk factors and outcomes of patients who suffered from PMI after elective aortic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 863 patients who underwent elective aortic surgery for aneurysms or Leriche syndrome were retrospectively analysed with regard to PMI. The diagnosis of PMI was based on a positive serum troponin diagnostic test. According to the clinical signs and symptoms, the patients with PMI were divided into two groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Comorbidities, preoperative medication, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, mortality, length of intensive care stay and hospitalisation, as well as the long-term follow-up, were compared in a matched-pair analysis (1:3) with patients without PMI. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for PMI. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with PMI were identified. Cardiac comorbidities (previous myocardial ischemia, P = 0.0099; left ventricular systolic dysfunction, P = 0.0429), ASA score ≥III (P = 0.0114) and preoperative elevated creatinine (P = 0.0194) were more common in patients who suffered PMI. The regression analysis confirmed that peripheral artery disease and prolonged operative duration >180 min are significant predictors of PMI. Surgical complications (wound healing deficit, P = 0.0027; rate of secondary interventions during primary admission, P = 0.0057) and medical complications (pneumonia, P = 0.0002; renal dysfunction, P = 0.0041) were more common in patients with PMI compared to the control group. Patients who suffered PMI remained in intensive care for a significantly longer period (P = 0.0001) and were also hospitalized for longer (P = 0.0001) than the control group. The long-term survival of patients who suffered PMI after aortic surgery was significantly worse than the control group (P < 0.0001, median 53 vs. 84 months), independent of clinical ischemia-associated symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: PMI after aortic surgery not only affects long-term survival, but also correlates with worsening of surgical outcome. Thus, meticulous preoperative risk stratification is required for high-risk patients, together with routine postoperative monitoring of troponin levels after aortic surgery.

Fifteen-year, single-center experience with in situ reconstruction for infected native aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the survival and freedom from reinfection for patients with infected native aortic aneurysms (INAAs) treated with in situ revascularization (ISR), using either open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and to identify the predictors of outcome. METHODS: Patients with INAAs who had undergone ISR from January 2005 to December 2020 were included in the present retrospective single-center study. The diagnosis of INAAs required a combination of two or more of the following criteria: (1) clinical presentation, (2) laboratory results, (3) imaging findings, and (4) intraoperative findings. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, estimated survival, patency, and freedom from reinfection using the Kaplan-Meier method. The predictive factors for adverse outcomes were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Fisher exact test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (53 men [81.5%]; median age, 69.0 years; interquartile range, 61.5-75.0 years) were included, 31 (47.7%) were immunocompromised, 60 were symptomatic (92.3%), and 32 (49.2%) had presented with rupture, including 3 aortocaval fistulas (4.6%) and 12 aortoenteric fistulas (18.5%). The most common location was infrarenal (n = 39; 60.0%). Of the 65 patients, 55 (84.6%) had undergone primary OSR with ISR, 3 (4.6%) had required EVAR as a bridge to OSR, and 8 (12.3%) had undergone EVAR as definitive treatment. The approach was a midline laparotomy for 44 patients (67.7%), mostly followed by reconstruction and aortic-aortic bypass (n = 28; 40.6%) and the use of a silver and triclosan Dacron graft (n = 30; 43.5%). Causative organisms were identified in 55 patients (84.6%). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 6.2% (n = 4) and 10.8% (n = 7). The median follow-up was 33.5 months (interquartile range, 13.6-62.3 months). The estimated 1- and 5-year survival rates were 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.6%-87.7%) and 67.4% (95% CI, 51.2%-79.3%). The corresponding freedom from reinfection rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 81.1%-97.1%) and 79.4% (95% CI, 59.1%-90.3%). On multivariate analysis, in-hospital mortality increased with uncontrolled sepsis (P < .0001), rapidly expanding aneurysms (P = .008), and fusiform aneurysms (P = .03). The incidence of reinfection increased with longer operating times (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of ISR and OSR combined with targeted antimicrobial therapy functioned reasonably well in the treatment of INAAs, although larger, prospective, multicenter studies with appropriately powered comparative cohorts are necessary to confirm our findings and to determine the best vascular substitute and precise role of EVAR as a bridge to OSR or definitive treatment.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Endovascular and Open Repair for Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infective native aortic aneurysms (INAAs). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles reporting OSR and/or EVAR repair of INAA. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Moga-Score. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled measures. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies were included, with 22 studies reporting OSR alone, 6 studies reporting EVAR alone and 6 comparative studies for INAAs. The pooled estimates of infection-related complications (IRCs) were 8.2% (95% CI 4.9%-12.2%) in OSR cohort and 23.2% (95% CI 16.1%-31.0%) in EVAR cohort. EVAR was associated with a significantly increased risk of IRCs compared with OSR during follow-up (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7). As for survival outcomes, the summary estimate rate of all cause 30-day, 3-month and 1-year mortality in OSR cohort were 11.7% (95% CI 7.7%-16.1%), 21.6% (95%CI 16.3%-27.4%) and 28.3% (95% CI 20.5%-36.7%; I2=50.47%), respectively. For EVAR cohort, the summary estimate rate of all cause 30-day, 3-month and 1-year mortality were 4.9% (95% CI 1.1%-10.4%), 9.4% (95% CI 2.7%-18.7%) and 22.2% (95% CI 12.4%-33.7%), respectively. EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased of 30-day mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6). However, no difference was found between EVAR and OSR in 3-month (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0-1.1), 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.1) or aneurysm-related mortality (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-3.9). Moreover, no difference of incidence of reintervention was observed (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.7; I2=53.7%) between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR could provide better short-term survival than OSR in patients with INAAs. However, patients undergoing EVAR suffered from higher risks of IRCs. EVAR could be considered as an alternative for low-risk patients with well-controlled infections or patients considered high-risk for open reconstruction.

Timing of endovascular repair impacts long-term outcomes of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 5-year outcomes of acute versus subacute thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). METHODS: Between March 2008 and September 2018, 238 consecutive patients with uncomplicated ATBAD underwent TEVAR in the acute or subacute phase and were analyzed retrospectively. The primary end points were all-cause death and aortic-related death. The secondary end point was a composite of the outcomes of death from any cause, rupture, new dissection, retrograde type A aortic dissection, endoleak, and late reintervention. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Weight-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimate with landmark analysis and weighted Cox model were performed to assess time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: In the inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted population, the 30-day mortality was 1.5% in the acute TEVAR group and 0% in the subacute TEVAR group (P = .24). The incidence of 30-day adverse events occurred in 16.8% and 6.9% patients in the acute TEVAR and subacute TEVAR groups, respectively (P = .13). At 5 years, there was no statistically significant difference in all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-3.81; P = .39) and aortic-related death (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.34-3.60; P = .86) between the two groups. The composite outcomes occurred in 30 patients (23.0%) in the acute TEVAR group and 18 patients (22.3%) in the subacute TEVAR group, respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-1.25; P = .20). However, a landmark analysis of the composite outcomes indicated that there was a significant interaction between treatment effect and time (Pinteraction = .01), with a significantly higher incidence of the composite outcomes in the acute TEVAR group compared with the subacute TEVAR group within 1 year (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79; P = .02), and a comparable rate between 1 and 5 years (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.56-2.76; P = .59). CONCLUSIONS: At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences exist in the all-cause death and aortic-related death between acute and subacute TEVAR. However, acute TEVAR is associated with an increased rate of severe complications within 1 year, which suggests that performing TEVAR in the subacute phase of ATBAD may be the preferable option.

U-shaped relationship between platelet-lymphocyte ratio and postoperative in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a novel inflammatory marker, is generally associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk. We aimed to investigate the association between PLR and postoperative in-hospital mortality risk in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD). METHODS: Patients (n = 270) who underwent emergency surgery for AAAD at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between January 2014 and May 2019 were divided into three PLR-based tertiles. We used multiple regression analyses to evaluate the independent effect of PLR on in-hospital mortality, and smooth curve fitting and a segmented regression model with adjustment of confounding factors to analyze the threshold effect between PLR and in-hospital mortality risk. RESULTS: The overall postoperative in-hospital mortality was 13.33%. After adjusting for confounders, in-hospital mortality risk in the medium PLR tertile was the lowest (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06-0.66). We observed a U-shaped relationship between PLR and in-hospital mortality risk after smoothing spline fitting was applied. When PLR < 108, the in-hospital mortality risk increased by 10% per unit decrease in PLR (OR = 0.90, P = 0.001). When the PLR was between 108 and 188, the mortality risk was the lowest (OR = 1.02, P = 0.288). When PLR > 188, the in-hospital mortality risk increased by 6% per unit increase in PLR (OR = 1.06, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: There was a U-shaped relationship between PLR and in-hospital mortality in patients with AAAD, with an optimal PLR range for the lowest in-hospital mortality risk of 108-188. PLR may be a useful preoperative prognostic tool for predicting in-hospital mortality risk in patients with AAAD and can ensure risk stratification and early treatment initiation.

Application of the Type, Entry Site, and Malperfusion Classification in Treatment of Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Our goal is to investigate a new practical dissection classification system, including type of dissection, location of the tear of the primary entry, and malperfusion. METHODS: The outcome of 151 patients with aortic dissection between January 2019 and May 2020 retrospectively were analyzed. All cases were classified with the Stanford dissection classification (A and B) by adding type non-A non-B. They were then further classified by the new classification system, including location of the primary Entry (E) and Malperfusion (M). All cases were followed up for six months. RESULTS: The distribution of 151 patients was 53.0%, 27.8%, and 19.2%, respectively, in type A, B, and non-A non-B. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.8%, 2.4%, and 3.4% in type A, B, and non-A non-B (P < 0.05) and postoperative neurological complications occurred in 33.8%, 7.1%, and 13.8% in type A, B, and non-A non-B (P < 0.05). Total arch replacement was performed in 53.8%, 4.8%, and 13.8% in type A, B, and non-A non-B. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.0%, 10.4%, and 8.5% in type E1, E2 and E3, while it was 20.0%, 10.4%, and 8.5% in type M1, M2 and M3 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The new practical dissection classification system is useful as a supplement to the Stanford dissection classification by regarding the extent of the disease process, aiding in decision-making about the operative indication and plan, and helping in anticipating prognosis.

Effect of holiday admission for acute aortic dissection on in-hospital mortality in Japan: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted on weekends have higher mortality than those admitted on weekdays. However, whether the "weekend effect" results in a higher mortality after admission for acute aortic dissection (AAD),-classified according to Stanford types-remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between admission day and in-hospital mortality in AAD Type A and B. METHODS: We used data from the Japanese registry of all Cardiac and Vascular Diseases Diagnostic Procedure Combination, a nationwide claim-based database with data from 953 certified hospitals, and enrolled in-patients with AAD admitted between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016. Based on the admission day, we stratified patients into groups (Weekdays, Saturdays, and Sundays/holidays). The influence of the admission day on in-hospital mortality was assessed via multi-level logistic regression analysis. We also performed a Stanford type-based stratified analysis. RESULTS: Among the included 25,641 patients, in-hospital mortality was 16.0%. The prevalence of patients admitted with AAD was relatively higher on weekdays. After adjustment for covariates, patients admitted on a Sunday/holiday showed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.33, p<0.001) than patients admitted on weekdays. Among patients admitted on a Sunday/holiday, only the subgroup of Stanford Type A showed a significantly increased risk of in-hospital mortality. (Stanford Type A, non-surgery vs. surgery groups: 95% CI 1.06-1.48 vs. 1.17-1.68, p<0.001 for both groups, OR 1.25 vs. 1.41, respectively, Stanford Type B, non-surgery vs. surgery groups: 95% CI 0.64-1.09 vs. 0.40-2.10; p = 0.182 vs. 0.846; OR 0.84 vs. 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with AAD Type A admitted on a Sunday/holiday may have an increased in-hospital mortality risk.

Development of SAB model for predicting mortality in intensive care unit after aortic aneurysm surgery.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysm (AA) patients after vascular surgery are at high risk of death, some of them need intensive care. Our aim was to develop a simplified model with baseline data within 24 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission to early predict mortality. METHODS: Univariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to select important variables, which were then taken into logistic regression to fit the model. Discrimination and validation were used to evaluate the performance of the model. Bootstrap method was conducted to perform internal validation. Finally, decision clinical analysis curve was used to test the clinical usefulness of the model. RESULTS: We obtained baseline data of 482 AA patients from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database, 33 (6.8%) of whom died in ICU. Our final model contained three variables and was called SAB model based on initials of three items [Sepsis, Anion gap, Bicarbonate (SAB)]. Area under the curve of SAB was 0.904 (95% CI: 0.841-0.967) while brier score was 0.043 (95% CI: 0.028-0.057). After internal validation, corrected area under the curve was 0.898 and brier score was 0.045, which showed good prediction ability of SAB model. The model can be assessed on https://vascularmodel.shinyapps.io/AorticAneurysm/. CONCLUSIONS: SAB model derived in this study can be easily used to predict in-ICU mortality of AA patients after surgery precisely.

Risk factors and in-hospital mortality of postoperative hyperlactatemia in patients after acute type A aortic dissection surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlactatemia may be caused by increased production due to tissue hypoxia or non-hypoxia. The aim of this study was first to identify risk factors for postoperative hyperlactatemia (POHL) after Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery (AADS) and construct a predictive model, and second to evaluate the impact of POHL on prognosis. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients undergoing AADS from January 2016 to December 2019 in Wuhan Union Hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for POHL. A nomogram predicting POHL was established based on these factors and was validated in the original dataset. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to assess the ability of postoperative lactate levels to predict the in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients developed POHL after AADS (38.6%). Male gender, surgery history, red blood cell transfusion and cardiopulmonary bypass time were identified as independent predictors. The C-index of the prediction model for POHL was 0.72, indicating reasonable discrimination. The model was well calibrated by visual inspection and goodness-of-fit test (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 10.25, P = 0.25). Decision and clinical impact curves of the model showed good clinical utility. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10.1%. Postoperative lactate levels showed a moderate predictive power for postoperative in-hospital mortality (C-index: 0.72). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a prediction model for POHL in patients undergoing AADS, which may have clinical utility in personal risk evaluation and preventive interventions. The POHL could be a good predictor for in-hospital mortality.

Admission white blood cell count predicts post-discharge mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection: data from the MIMIC-III database.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation underlies both the pathogenesis and prognosis in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD). This study aimed to assess the association of ICU admission of white blood cell count (WBCc) with post-discharge mortality in these patients. METHODS: Clinical data were extracted from the MIMIC-III V1.4 database. After adjusted to covariables, Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were performed to determine the relationship between WBCc on admission and post-discharge mortality (30-day, 90-day, 1-year and 5-year) in AAD patients. Subgroup analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to test the performance of WBCc in predicting mortality in AAD patients. RESULTS: A total of 325 eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: normal-WBCc group (≤ 11 k/uL) and high-WBCc group (> 11 K/uL). In univariate Cox regression analysis, high WBCc was significant risk predictor of 30-day, 90-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI, P 2.58 1.36-4.91 0.004; 3.16 1.76-5.70 0.000; 2.74 1.57-4.79 0.000; 2.10 1.23-3.54 0.006]. After adjusting for age and other risks, high WBCc remained a significant predictor of 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality in AAD patients (HR, 95% CI, P 1.994 1.058-3.76 0.033; 2.118 1.175-3.819 0.013; 2.37 1.343-4.181 0.003). The area under ROC curve of WBCc for predicting 30-day, 90-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality were 0.69, 0.70, 0.66 and 0.61, respectively. The results from subgroups analysis showed that there was no interaction in most strata and patients who were younger than 69 years of age or had history of respiratory disease with an elevated WBCc had an excess risk of 30-day mortality (HR, 95% CI, P 3.18 1.41-7.14 0.005; 3.84 1.05-14.13 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Higher than normal WBCc on admission may predict post-discharge mortality in patients with AAD.

Association between anion gap and mortality of aortic aneurysm in intensive care unit after open surgery.

BACKGROUND: There has not been a well-accepted prognostic model to predict the mortality of aortic aneurysm patients in intensive care unit after open surgery repair. Otherwise, our previous study found that anion gap was a prognosis factor for aortic aneurysm patients. Therefore, we wanted to investigate the relationship between anion gap and mortality of aortic aneurysm patients in intensive care unit after open surgery repair. METHODS: From Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III, data of aortic aneurysm patients in intensive care unit after open surgery were enrolled. The primary clinical outcome was defined as death in intensive care unit. Univariate analysis was conducted to compare the baseline data in different groups stratified by clinical outcome or by anion gap level. Restricted cubic spline was drawn to find out the association between anion gap level and mortality. Subgroup analysis was then conducted to show the association in different level and was presented as frost plot. Multivariate regression models were built based on anion gap and were adjusted by admission information, severity score, complication, operation and laboratory indicators. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to compare the prognosis ability of anion gap and simplified acute physiology score II. Decision curve analysis was finally conducted to indicate the net benefit of the models. RESULTS: A total of 405 aortic aneurysm patients were enrolled in this study and the in-intensive-care-unit (in-ICU) mortality was 6.9%. Univariate analysis showed that elevated anion gap was associated with high mortality (P value < 0.001), and restricted cubic spline analysis showed the positive correlation between anion gap and mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the mortality predictive ability of anion gap approached that of simplified acute physiology score II and even performed better in predicting in-hospital mortality (P value < 0.05). Moreover, models based on anion gap showed that 1 mEq/L increase of anion gap improved up to 42.3% (95% confidence interval 28.5-59.8%) risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: The level of serum anion gap was an important prognosis factor for aortic aneurysm mortality in intensive care unit after open surgery.

Association of Mental Health Disorders and Aortic Dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Mental health disorders (MHD), including substance abuse, have been associated with aortic dissection (AD). Aneurysmal degeneration in the residual untreated aorta after both open and endovascular treatment is not uncommon in AD. Thus, diligent long-term follow-up is necessary and MHD may play a role in treatment plan and surveillance. The impact of MHD on management, outcomes and follow-up after AD treatment is unknown and here we sought to evaluate these associations. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all patients diagnosed with Stanford Type A and B dissections from 2008 to 2018 at a tertiary referral center. MHD was defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 649 non-traumatic aortic dissections were identified in the study timeframe. The cohort consisted of 51% Type A (n = 334) dissection and 49% Type B (n = 315) dissection. Mental health disorders were present in 49.3% of the cohort. Notably, the timing of MHD diagnosis relative to development of AD is unknown in the majority of patients. Within the Type A population, a MHD was present in 50.6% (N = 162) of patients, of which the most common indication for MHD was the presence of antidepressant or antipsychotic medication (28.6%). In patients with Type A dissections, the presence of a MHD did not significantly affect the rate of index hospitalization intervention (68%) or long-term mortality (12.5% in patients with a MHD). Within the Type B population, a MHD was present in 49.4% (n = 158) of patients, of which the most common indication for MHD was the presence of antidepressant or antipsychotic medication (30.5%). In patients with Type B dissections, the presence of a MHD did not significantly affect the rate of index hospitalization intervention (50.3% in patients with a MHD) or long-term mortality (10.1% in patients with a MHD). The overall participation in follow-up care was not significantly decreased based on the presence of a MHD compared to those without a MHD (1.66 ± 2.16 years vs. 1.68 ± 2.20 years, P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: MHD is more prevalent in AD patients than in the general population, but demonstrating a causal relationship between MHD and development/progression of AD is challenging. Despite a high prevalence of MHD in AD patients, in-hospital mortality and follow-up compliance was similar to non-MHD patients.